Matt Holthe's Fleeting Thoughts

I found this document from the NOAA web site that ranks cities based on the percent annual possible sunshine. Las Vegas is third on the list with the sun shining 85% of the time. Phoenix is at 85% as well. Denver is 30th on the list with 69%. Bloomington, IL isn't listed, but Peoria (45 mins away, for those that don't know) is. They are 124 on the list at 56%.

Just counting home games, Illinois was tenth in attendance at 15,851 per game. Kentucky was first at 23,603 per game. If you count all games (home, road, neutral) then was one of 12 schools (including BYU) who had over a half a million people watch them (505,094 total, just ahead of Duke). Kentucky also lead in that category at 755,748. Colorado was 77th at 7,014 per game. Colorado St was 4,879, but posted the eighth highest increase in attendance from 2010, going up 1,487 per game. BYU was tops in that category, going up 4,685 per game to 18,714. Denver University was tenth in that same category, going up 1,409 per game to 3,388. The Big Ten had the highest average attendance at 12,826 per game. The Mountain West set an attendance record with 1,322,705 fans and was sixth in the nation. The Big 12 was fourth in the nation, but their attendance dropped to 10,716 per game. For the conference tournaments, the ACC was tops with 23,381 per game. For the NCAA tournament, Cleveland had the hi...

Tim and I ended up picking all 67 games in the NCAA tournament. We didn't each all pick all the lines and totals, but alternated all the time as I've described in my earlier posts. So we each had 67 picks made (67 lines, 67 totals). I started out 6-12-2, but ended up 37-28-2, which is a respectable 56.7% Tim ended up 29-37-1, which is 44.03% Looking at tip-time lines and totals, for the entire tournament favorites were 31-35-1. Out of the 67 games, 28 went over, 36 went under, and there were 3 pushes. If you had blindly picked the under on every game, you would have won almost 56% of the time, so you would have made a little bit of money (or come close to even after the vig).

Saturday morning, I sent Tim a text saying that I didn't like any of the available bets for the Final Four. But since we had picked every game so far, there was no stopping now. I started and picked Kentucky/Connecticut over 140. That was a loss. Tim then picked VCU/Butler under 134. That was a win. Then I picked VCU +2.5 against Butler. That was a loss, so I went 0-2. Finally, Tim picked Kentucky -2 against Connecticut. That was a loss, so Tim went 1-1. For the national championship game, Tim started with Connecticut -3.5. He won that. Then I picked Butler/Connecticut under 129.5. I won that. For the final four, I was 1-2 and Tim was 2-1.

Well, it's April Fools Day. A quarter of the year is complete. Time to see how I'm doing towards keeping my Hilton Diamond and American Airlines Platinum status for another year. Hilton Diamond: I need 28 stays or 60 nights to maintain my status for next year. So far I have 7 stays and 12 nights. I'm right on pace (but with no room to spare) for the stays, and behind on the nights. I think I'll need to pick it up a bit in the future quarters. American Airlines Platinum I need 60 segments or 50,000 miles to maintain my status for next year. There is little chance I'll reach that miles total since I don't do any long trips (nothing overseas). 60 segments is what I shoot for. I have 19 segments so far this year, which is a good pace. I have a bit of room to spare, but I can't slack off. I have 11,043 miles toward my platinum status.

The final four this year is pretty unexpected - #3 seed UConn, #4 seed Kentucky, #8 seed Butler, and #11 seed VCU. Only 1 favorite (Kentucky) covered this weekend, and the teams were under their totals 3 times out of the 4 games. Tim and I both went 2-2 in our picks this weekend. I won both on Saturday and lost both on Sunday, Tim was 1-1 each day. My picks: Butler +4 vs Florida (win) Arizona +3 vs UConn (win) VCU/Kansas over 147.5 (loss) North Carolina +1 vs Kentucky (loss) Tim's picks: Arizona/UConn over 145 (loss) Butler/Florida over 132 (win) VCU +11.5 vs Kansas (win) Kentucky/North Carolina over 146.5 (loss) In my ESPN bracket, I am at the 4.0 percentile - 5,684,575th place (I can't tell how many total brackets there are).

The NCAA Sweet 16 played out over Thursday and Friday (4 games each night). The favorites covered the spread 3 times and didn't cover 5 times. (In fact, every time the favorite didn't cover, they actually lost the game - betting the underdog money lines might have been profitable). The totals (over/under) split evenly - 4 times going over, 4 times going under. Tim was 4-4 in his picks, and I was 6-2. I am doing much better against the spread starting with the round of 32. My bracket, however, is horrible. In my ESPN bracket, I was in the 4.8 percentile this morning and I can only get worse (I cannot possibly get any more points - all my final four teams have been eliminated). In the three pools I am in, I am in last place in all of them (14th out of 14, 27th out of 27, and 3rd and 4th out of 4 brackets in the last) with no chance of overtaking the people ahead of me.

We are down to the sweet 16 now in the NCAA tournament. The favorites came back to earth yesterday, going 2-6 against the spread. Totals split evenly - 4 over and 4 under. For the first 52 games of the tournament, favorites are 25-26-1. There have been 23 games over the total, 26 games under, with 3 pushes. As usual, Vegas is pretty well 50/50 in their lines and totals - it's a matter of being able to predict that will get you money. Speaking of money, I had another great day yesterday. 7-1 against the spread. Tim continued his woes, going 1-7 ATS. For the first 52 games, I am 28-22-2 (56%) and Tim is 21-30-1 (41%).

There was 1 game that could sum up the overall picks for Tim and I yesterday. I had San Diego St to cover the 6 point spread, and Tim had under 125.5 total points. At the end of the first overtime, the score was 61-61 (122 total points). So, if either team had won the game during regulation or during the first overtime (even with a last second three-pointer), I would have lost and Tim would have won. As it turned out, the second overtime saw San Diego St score 10 points to Temple's 3 points. The final was 71-64, which meant that I won my bet and Tim lost his bet. That's very similar to the 2003 Arizona/Gonzaga game in the round of 32. I was in Vegas and had a bet on the under for that game and they finally went over in the second overtime. Although I'm wondering now if my memory is failing me with that game. I just looked it up and the game was tied at 78 at the end of regulation and tied at 89 at the end of the first overtime. That would mean that Vegas had the total at so...

Tim and I picked all the lines and totals again today. Again, we alternated making picks. You could pick any game and either the line or the total. We ended up with 2 games each where we picked both the line and total. It seems that every time that happens it's a split - you win one and lose one. I had a better day today. I was 9-7 today. Tim was right at the 50/50 mark - he was 8-8. Overall, it was not the day for the chalk. Favorites were 4-12 against the spread. There were 4 games that went over, 11 that went under, and 1 push. If you wonder why there was a push overall but Tim and I didn't have a push, it's because I picked the game before the line changed. I had Illinois/UNLV over 132. At tip-off the total was 135. The final was 73-62 (135 points), so I won that pick but for the "overall" I take the game-time lines/totals, so it was a push.

Some real exciting games today - more in the morning with several close games than in the evening. 5 of the first 7 games were decided by 3 points or less (1 by 3 points, 3 by 2 points, and 1 by 1 point). Overall there were 5 games decided by 1 or 2 points, which tied for the most in a single NCAA tournament day in history. Picks against the spread, however, left a lot to be desired. I went 4-12 for the day and Tim went 7-8-1. In my defense, two of my losses were by a half point each. Both times the tip-off line moved a point against me and if I would have gotten the tip-off line I would have won. That's some bad luck! (I picked Bucknell/UConn under 132.5; at tip the total was 133.5; the final was 81-52, which is 133 points. The other game was BYU -8.5; at the tip it was BYU -7.5; they won by 8, 74-66). Overall, favorites were 10-6 and 8 of the 16 games went over, 7 went under, with 1 total push (Richmond/Vanderbilt landed right on 135 points).

Tim and I picked the NCAA first four games (new in 2011), both the lines and the totals. We alternated - pick the line, then the other picks the total, then switch. My picks: UNC Asheville -4 vs Arkansas Little-Rock (push) UAB/Clemson under 122 (push) Texas San Antonio -4 vs Alabama St (win) USC/VCU under 127.5 (win) So I was 2-0-2 Tim's picks: UNC Asheville/Ark Little-Rock over 130 (win) Clemson -4.5 vs UAB (win) Tex San Antonio/Alabama St under 128.5 (loss) VCU +4.5 vs USC (win) Tim was 3-1 That means we tied head-to-head for the first four games.

I run a web site that does a lot with college basketball, including having brackets for the conference tournaments and the post season tournaments. There are a lot of different conference tournament brackets (12 teams, 11 teams, 10 teams, brackets where teams get byes into the semi-finals, the 16 team Big East bracket with 2 types of byes, and so on). There's also different post season (NCAA regional, NIT, and so on). Last year there was a new post season tournament added. It's called the College Insider Tournament (C.I.T.). The setup was a 16-team tournament where teams were re-seeded after every round. That allowed for geographical efficiencies with the scheduling (so a team wouldn't have to go cross-country unless there was no other option). That was a brand new type of bracket (16 team with no real bracket until after a round was over). So I had to code a whole new type of tournament for that last year. This year, the C.I.T. changed again. Now it is a 24 team tournament...

As a follow-up to Picking 87 games , Tim and I picked both the lines and totals in the four games yesterday (selection Sunday). We started with me picking both the line and total of the first game, then Tim picking both for the second game, and so on. I picked Dayton +4.5 vs Richmond, over 125.5 - Richmond won 67-54, so I lost both. Tim picked North Carolina +3.5 vs Duke, over 146.5 - Duke won 75-58, so Tim lost both. I picked Kentucky +2 vs Florida, over 137.5 - Kentucky won 70-54, so I split (one win, one loss). Tim picked Penn St +10 vs Ohio St, under 127 - Ohio St won 71-60, so Tim lost both. That's 1-7 for the 8 total picks between the two of us. Glad we weren't in Vegas for those picks!

My friend Tim and I picked 87 NCAA basketball games against the spread on Saturday. We alternated picks - first I would pick one, then he would pick one. Once a pick was made, the other person was automatically the "house" for that pick (meaning, you automatically had to take the other side). The way the picks were made, you wanted to make the ones you were most confident about early (before the other person had a chance to pick it). We made the picks in 3 waves - morning games, afternoon games, and night games. There were 24 morning games, 35 afternoon games, and 28 night games based on our breakdowns. In the morning games, Tim was 4-7-1 and I was 8-4. Our "top half" (picks 1 through 6 for this set) were both 2-4, however. That means I was 6-0 in the games lower down the list (ones I was basically guessing). In the afternoon games, Tim was 8-10 and I was 6-11. Our "top half" (1-9) picks were both 2-7. Again, we did better on the ones where we were guessin...

Some interesting percentages in the game of blackjack... If a dealer has an Ace showing, about 31% of the time they will have a ten underneath. Only card counters should take insurance. And if that dealer doesn't have a ten underneath with that Ace showing, they have a 12% chance of busting. That's why what to changes so much with an Ace showing. If a dealer has a 5 or 6 showing, they have the best chance of busting, but it's still only 42%. Yes, you should still stand on your hard 12 or 13, but you're only going to win slightly more than 2 in 5 of those hands. But standing is still better than taking the chance you will bust.

This article came from SB Nation Cleveland : We can now officially put a ribbon on Super Bowl XLV. The game between the Pittsburgh Steelers and Green Bay Packers was a win for the sportsbooks - marking the 15th time in 16 years that sportsbooks came away as winners. The only time they lost was in 2007 when the New York Giants upset the New England Patriots. According to RJ Bell of Pregame.com, $87.5 million was wagered in Nevada alone with $724,000 being won by the sportsbooks. It was the smallest haul by the 'books since 1998 when the Denver Broncos beat the Packers in Super Bowl XXXII. "Packers and Over was by far the worst possible result for the sportsbooks, and even so they ended up net winners. This is a great example of the steep uphill climb the average player faces trying to win." said Bell. An amazing stat, however is the fact that Las Vegas accounts for just 1% of the worldwide Super Bowl 'handle', or the total amount bet, and sportsbooks worldwide ...

Well, this week's storm was a pretty good one. I think a lot of people all across the country will remember it for a long time. Oklahoma City and Tulsa had record snows, Chicago and a lot of cities around here had top-5 snowfalls, Indianapolis had an inch of ice, .... It depended on which side of the street you were on in our neighborhood. Bloomington officially got 13" of snow. Our neighbors across the street had part of their driveway clear and part with about a foot of snow. On our side, though, we had drifts that I measured at 35", and at least 2 feet everywhere on the driveway. I used the snow blower enough for us to get a car out of the garage. This weekend I'll continue shoveling us out to clear the whole driveway before any more snow comes (a chance of some Sunday). We lost power around 10 in the morning on Wednesday. We were trying to figure out what to do - went over to some friends for dinner. A 19-month old just doesn't understand enough (she wouldn...

There's a forecast of a lot of snow over the next couple of days. It's supposed to start tonight, with a couple inches of snow overnight. It's supposed to snow throughout the day tomorrow, with up to six more inches in the forecast. The snow is supposed to get even heavier tomorrow night. All told, it could be up to a foot and a half of snow by the time it's all over Wednesday, and then it's supposed to turn cold and get windy - just the kind of thing you want after a bunch of snow. Hopefully it's not as bad as they are calling, but I guess it's better to prepare for the worst and be surprised by less than to be surprised by more.... And, further south (southern Illinois) they are calling for up to an inch of ice before it starts snowing - that's going to be a big mess. I guess getting all that would be worse than the snow we're supposed to get.

Between myself, my wife, and my 19-month-old daughter, I don't think the three of us have all been healthy at the same time since last September. My daughter is almost over the cold she's had for a couple weeks, my wife has a full-body rash that's finally starting to get better, and I came back from New York last week with a cold.