Four play in games?

The play-in game (or "opening round game") is a stupid idea. I personally like the idea of 4 play-in games to determine #12 or #13 seeds and not 1 to determine a #16 seed.

My idea:
Teams from mid-major conferences who win the regular season (get the #1 seed in the conference tournament) but don't win the conference tournament get first dibs for inclusion in the play-in games. They are only eligible if the committee deems them to be "bubble-worthy" teams. This year, that would have included Davidson.
If that pool makes up 8 teams, great. If not, then additional bubble teams are included. These should be from mid-majors as well, but don't have to be. Penn State might have been in this list, or San Diego State.
Those teams play on Tuesday night and feed into #12 or #13 seeds (depending on how the brackets work out - basically the "last four in" positions). They play at the same site as who they are going to face Thursday or Friday in the 12/5 or 13/4 matchup. So Davidson and San Diego State would play in Miami and the winner would take on #4 Wake Forest in the Midwest Region.

Drawback:
You can't really fill out your bracket until Wednesday. Because you may or may not want to pick that upset based on Tuesday's results. Big deal. Many people don't fill it out until Wednesday, anyway.

Who's with me??

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tasker: Get Voice Command

Blackjack Streak House Advantage

Picking 87 NCAA Basketball Games